(Filed under stock picking, stock tips, hot stock tips, stock advice )

By Bill Flekenstein
MSN Money Central

Recently I have been struck by the number of talking heads declaring that the housing market or economy has bottomed, along with their expectation of what comes next — i.e., the recent Newsweek Magazine cover: “The Recession Is Over. Good luck surviving the recovery.”

To state the obvious, the reason there’s always such an intense focus on the “bottom” is because of the implication of what comes next: better times.

I think that in most people’s minds, it is assumed that after something bottoms out, the recovery will be rather strong, if not V-shaped. Not necessarily.

Throw out the rule book for this recovery
The economy stopped getting worse sometime during the first quarter. It has benefited from massive amounts of money printing, inventory restocking and better business prospects in Asia. But I think the most important point for folks to understand is that it’s not business as usual.

Facebook users: Become a fan of MSN Money

The United States is going through something unprecedented: The collapsed credit/real estate bubble (which followed the collapse of a stock bubble), and the attendant economic consequences (not the least of which has been the distinct inability to create jobs on the heels of a brutal bloodletting), have prompted a massive outpouring of quantitative easing.

Of course, further complicating the handicapping of future economic activity is that the once-radical view that unemployment is intractable has now become mainstream, almost ensuring some unforeseen wrinkle.

(Article Tags include stock picking, stock tips, hot stock picks, stock advice )

More from MSN Money
Do Intel’s numbers spell recovery?
Why this recession feels so bad
The difficulties of creating jobs
Why you won’t like the recovery
What’s next: Inflation or deflation?

None of this was surprising. Given what occurred in the credit bubble, many of us expected just such a horrendous economic period. But that has been fought with (also predictable) money printing on the part of the Fed and other central banks, which is what’s called quantitative easing.

So what rages today is the battle between two epic forces: the credit collapse and money printing. The battle has many ramifications. For the financial markets, the quantitative easing and a few less-bad-than-expected economic developments have helped produce the rallies just described. But that does not necessarily mean that a much better economy and job creation lie dead-ahead.

And, after all, we haven’t even begun to deal with the implications of the funding crisis I’ve discussed more than once.

Thus, I would urge folks to be slower to leap to conclusions and more open-minded about the potential economic and financial road map, keeping in mind the forces at work in the background. Their ramifications will be with us for quite some time.

If I had to give one side of the battle the upper hand, I’d give it to money printing, as I have with my investments.

An SEC (belatedly) full of fire and brimstone
Regular readers know that selling stocks short has been part of my investment strategy. Which brings me to the “new” Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

Essentially, these are the rules it introduced last fall aimed at continuing a crackdown on naked short selling. (Until then, the SEC had never bothered to enforce the rules regarding this illegal practice. Sound familiar?)

To which I say: better late than never.

Video on MSN Money
Get ready for the (slow) recovery

There are signs the recession may end in coming months, but the U.S. economy’s recovery is likely to be so painfully slow that many won’t feel the difference. David Wessel reports.

(Tags Include stock picking, stock tips, hot stock picks, stock advice )

However, I would like to voice my objection to the innuendo that somehow short-sellers drive prices lower. Lower share prices are a function of the business, the economy, bad luck and/or mismanagement — not short-sellers. What short-sellers often do is to warn of impending problems. How many in government, corporate America or the media at large do that? It’s time to place blame where it’s due, not where it’s convenient.

Continued: ‘I do,’ says Yahoo

‘I do,’ says Yahoo
Finally, in the “recovering short-seller” department (for folks who don’t know, I closed my 13-year-old short-only hedge fund in March):

A few weeks ago, I disclosed the expansion of my long position in Microsoft (MSFT, news, msgs) — see my column from July 20, as well as the one from March 16 — because the company offered too much promise versus its valuation to keep my stake at its modest level. (Microsoft publishes MSN Money.)

Last Wednesday, indeed, suggested the potential of more good things to come, as it appears that Microsoft finally managed to do a deal with Yahoo (YHOO, news, msgs) without dramatically overpaying.

Want more? Follow MSN Money on Twitter

How well this will turn out down the road remains to be seen. But it’s a far cry better than the proposed $40 billion takeover of the entire beast that is Yahoo. (Lord knows what Steve Ballmer was thinking when he proposed that deal; shareholders can just be thankful that it never happened.)

In any case, Mr. Market may have cast a small vote of confidence last Wednesday, when Microsoft finished slightly positive on a down day.

At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein owned shares of the following company mentioned in this column: Microsoft.

(Topics include stock picking, stock tips, hot stock picks, stock advice)